Sunday, 1 December 2019

Punctuation

PUNCTUATION


“Your eyes see what your mind knows.”
It is important that there are no punctuation errors in any writeup. It is a big blot on the writer’s effort and it is best avoided. It’s not very gratifying when these mistakes or typos are pointed out. Hence, we need to periodically re-brush our basic writing skills. 
Some intricacies are not well known and understood. Here we make an attempt to underline some such nuances and improve our skills.
Let our minds know first . . .

Punctation’s main purpose is to help readers understand what you wish to say. It signals the grammatical or logical structure of the sentence.
It is broadly divided into two broad categories: The Stops and the other marks.

Stops

They correspond often loosely to the pauses and intonations in speech, vocal signals which help listeners follow what we say.
They include the period, the semi-colon, the comma and the dash.

Other marks

These are purely visual signals and do not mark pauses.
They include the apostrophe, the quotation mark, the hyphen, the parenthesis, brackets, the ellipsis and diacritics.
We will look at the most commonly used (and sometimes misused) ones today. The other ones are less commonly used and in many cases their use is relatively straight forward. However, we may consider them in future if requested.

Dash

It’s a punctuation mark that looks like an extended hyphen and comes in two sizes: an em dash (—) and  en dash (-).
Em literally means the amount of space the letter M will occupy when you typewrite it and En the space used as in the letter N.

Em dash

It is used to mark a sudden break from the general run of the passage. It is one of the most misused punctuation mark. 
Please note that classically there is no space before or after the dash. But modern usage has  changed a bit and some are using spaces, especially in newsprint. Important is to be consistent and stick to one format.
Usage can be summarized as follows:
§  It introduces something that develops or what has gone before:
You must have noticed it, I’m sure—the tricolor fluttering atop the nondescript office.
§  It is used in pairs to show words in parenthesis or mark an intrusive sentence:
After finishing his schooling in Nainital—where he wrote the epic A Salute to a Hero in 1996—he migrated to Canada to study English literature.
§  To introduce an aside by the writer:
I occupied the suite in the Panorama hotel and Vicky the guest room—this purely for the strategic requirement.
§  In direct speech to mark a break off or an interruption:
I looked disgusted as he said, “You cannot go to—”
§  It is used to indicate a conclusion without expressing it:
“He is an excellent man but—”
§  A dash is used to introduce a repetition for oratorial effect:
Shakespeare was the greatest of all poets—Shakespeare, the intellectual ocean whose waves washed the continents of all thought.
§  To introduce a list:
He excelled in three branches—arithmetic, algebra and geometry.
§  To indicate what is not expected:
He delved deep into bowels of the earth and found instead of a hidden treasure—a button.

En dash

An en dash is used to show sequences:.
2018-2038
An A-Z guide
Again, there is no space before or after it. 
Do not mix two styles of writing it. e.g. from 2018-2038 is wrong usage.
It is also used to denote omission of letters or figures:
Mathew VII:5-8 
R--l (rascal)

Ellipsis

Ellipsis is a series of three dots (or four in certain situations). The principal function is to mark the omission of material from a quotation.
§  The three dots are used to mark the deleted matter in a quoted sentence:
“The traditional texts of the Hindu religion . . . state that the priests are paid in gold.”
The omitted text in the above sentence is ‘the sacred Vedas’.
Note the spacing used: space is left between the preceding word, between each dot and the succeeding word.
§  Four dots are used to mark the end of the sentence:
Dante, someone has noted, is “the last great Catholic poet. . . .”
Note the spacing now: First dot marks the end of the sentence and sits tightly on the preceding word followed by the three dots of ellipsis.
In contrast, if it wasn’t the end of the sentence, it would be:
Dante, someone has remarked, is “the last . . . great Catholic poet.”
§  Now if the original sentence from which the final words were dropped was closed with a query, the appropriate stop is placed immediately after the final word, followed by the standard three dots.
It has been asked, “Was Bahadur Shah the last great Mughal emperor? . . .”
§  Ellipsis is used in dialogue to indicate doubt, indecision, weariness or even suspense.
She sighed and answered, “I really don’t know. . . .”
The 2036 Olympic Games will be held in . . . New Delhi!”
§  It is used to imply a conclusion which readers are expected to infer for themselves:
And we certainly know what to expect when the #countdown ends. . . .

Quotation marks

Quotation marks are used in direct quotes, mark certain titles and to give certain words a special meaning.
American writing uses double quotes, switching to single to include a quote within a quote. British writing does exactly the opposite. Use of both is equally acceptable. Sticking to one style and being consistent goes without saying.

Quotation Marks with Direct Quotations

A direct quotation consists of words actually spoken or written by someone. Whereas indirect reports the substance of what has been said.
Victor said, “We are going to a movie.”
Victor said that they were going to a movie.
Three ways a quotation can be introduced:
Naren said, “I am not in favour of this.”
“I am not in favour of this,” Naren said.
“I,” Naren said, “am not in favour of this.”
Notice the placement of commas in these three sentences. Also note that in the third case, there is no capitalisation in the second part.
Written quotations are also formally preceded by a colon:
Professor Gupta says : “Man is always on the hunt for inner peace.”
Matter is complicated as far as closing quotes are concerned. In American usage, commas and periods always come inside a final quote mark; semicolons and colons, outside.
Victor said, “We are not going.”
Victor said, “We are not going,” and they didn’t.
Victor said, “We are not going”; they didn’t.
Victor said, “We are not going”: why, he wondered.
But the same does not hold true in case of question marks and exclamation marks. It depends on whether the stop applies only to the quotation, only to the sentence containing the quotation, or to both.
Rama asked, “Are we eating out?”
Did Rama say, “We are eating out”?
Did Rama ask, “Are we eating out?”
The usage in British writing is slightly different and at times it can be confusing.

Quotation marks with titles

A title of a work is usually italicized. If it is part of something larger (magazine or anthology) then it is quoted.
Chetan Bhagat’s novel Five Point Someone has been made into a movie.
“The Red Room” by H.G. Wells explores the depths of subconscious mind to reveal its lurking terror.
Titles of movies are italicized whereas those of television shows are quoted:
“Grey’s Anatomy” is a medical drama with a cult following.
Interstellar and Martian are the most scientifically-authentic Hollywood movies.

Quotations to signify special meaning

Sometimes we need to use a common word in a different sense. We then put it in quotes:
Doon school is one of the top-most “public” schools in India. 
They can be used for citation terms—to refer to something different that its conventional meaning.
“Horse trading” is a scourge of modern day coalition politics.
It can be used for quoting definitions.
“A LASER  is a device that emits light through a process of optical amplification based on the stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation.”

Hope you have liked this write up on some basics of Punctuation. If you would like to know more about others, drop in a comment. We will try and feature it in the next WOW. 

Photo by Raphael Schaller on Unsplash


Sunday, 14 July 2019

WHY I AM A HINDU?



What could have been a scholarly text on Hindu religion or Hindutva has been unfortunately reduced to a rant against a political adversary.

The author goes into great depth of origins of Hindu religion, philosophy, Hindu traditions; their origins in the Vedas and Upanishads. The understanding and explanations are profound and would be treat for every Hindu and a student of Hinduism.
The philosophies of Vivekanand, Savarkar, Golwalkar and Deen Dadayal Upadhyay have been explained in minute detail and are praise worthy. The birth of RSS and their ideology is superbly explained.
The later part of the book, once it touches the political arena- is when the book falls apart. The author is caught in his own contradictions. It sounds as if he has been commissioned to write a book by his political masters!
Mr. Tharoor tells us exactly what he likes about the Hindu way of life. Most notably that it encompasses all ways of worships, atheism, idolatry and even all rituals. (unlike Abrahamic religions) You can have your own way of reaching the ultimate truth. And he hates all the wrongs that are being done in the name of religion by the zealots and the bigots or bhakts as he would address them.
But he forgets one thing. It is this same faith and religion which he is a product of, which has whole heartedly embraced the political leadership of his adversary. Brandishing them as all wrong and taking a moral high ground that only he stands for the Hindu way of life is incomprehensible.
It is this same faith which he praises in the book, which has in its collective wisdom chosen this leadership. So he should be more gracious and acceptable of choice of the majority of the followers of this faith.
This is where his political optics kick in and had he stayed clear of it, the book would have become a scholarly text on the subject. But alas, the author chose to use it for his political ambitions.

Monday, 17 June 2019

GAMEOVER

GAMEOVER

Is it horror? Psycho-thriller? Paranormal? Supernatural? Well its everything and like nothing that you have seen before!






Sapna is a game developer who has been traumatized by physical and sexual abuse a year back. Now she is under threat again. Somebody is watching her house. A serial killer is on the loose. Is she the next target?
She is staying with her maid and separated from her family after the traumatic incident. Addicted to Pacman and nyctophobic she is struggling to overcome her fear and anxiety.
She had taken a tattoo on her forearm depicting the gamepad of her videogame, her addiction. As luck would have it, it turns out that it is a memorial tattoo that has the ashes of a deceased girl. (The one killed by the serial killer) She has got herself inked accidentally.
Sapna is struggling with so much happening to her. Her life goes for a spin. She visits her psychiatrist and tries committing suicide!
Tapasi Pannu is at her phenomenal best. Giving us one hit after another. Bettering her own record. The narrative is impeccable. The background score loud and jarry, probably done purposefully. The pace is moderate and at times gives you a perspective of the killer and sometimes the victim.
“What if life is a videogame?” pops out in the background in of the scenes. It gets more and more muddled and complicated. But it is a riveting drama that doesn’t let you off the hook even for a moment. It is something which has never been done in Indian cinema. It’s Tamil dubbed in Hindi. But dialogues are hardly required and noticeable. It’s the action and narrative. Just one hour and forty-five minutes later you are out of the hall.
Was it a reality? Was it paranormal or was it a game? Was it psychological? It could be anything, delusions or paranoia. You have to scratch your head as the director leaves many things for you to interpret. So if you are ready for this fantastic ride, buckle up and Game On before it’s Gameover!!



RATING : 4/5



Sunday, 16 June 2019

PLIGHT OF DOCTORS

PLIGHT OF DOCTORS



Medicine is not an exact science. It is a human quest for knowledge and effort to understand and usurp the forces of nature. In a way, mankind is trying to win over the laws of nature.
It is a constant ongoing battle and we as mankind have made a lot of progress. This progress has happened more in the last fifty years or so. Proportionate rapid progress has taken place in other fields like space science, defense technology, information technology and food management.
Humans have therefore raised unrealistic expectations out of medical science. They fail to understand that it is against the laws of nature that we are waging a battle. We don’t even know what exactly makes a human being alive. The understanding is finite. We still are not immortal and we cannot overcome death.
In an earlier era, it was accepted that this is a normal course of life. Old age, disease, and death were accepted parts of Human destiny. Gautam Buddha had realized it too and set out on his knowledge quest because of the same reason. He found his solace only once he attained enlightenment!
Hence, it is pertinent that doctors and patients understand this. Life is finite. We have progressed and to some extent succeeded in fighting some diseases and have increased the life expectancy a bit, but it is still minuscule in nature’s scheme of things.
Due to rapid progress and achievement of economic prosperity, humans have started feeling entitled to having perfect health. They think money can buy you health and life. It’s not so. They fail to understand that they are fighting nature. And they can’t win.
Doctors in their parlance talk of managing a case. Never treatment. “I treat, He Cures.” It is accepted and understood. Doctors should now make their patients aware of these things. Their unreasoned and unrealistic expectations have to be addressed even before they start ‘managing’ a case and not treating it. 
Every doctor who starts managing a case by prescribing drugs or performing a surgery tries to do it to the best of his capability. Not every time it gives the desired outcome. He tries hard. He also doesn’t want to fail. But it’s beyond his capabilities.
There are a lot of other problems too in this field. Not even the developed countries have a perfect solution. We are plagued with a huge population, which does not have the resources to care for itself. The government can only chip in up to a certain level. 
The problems get compounded when too many people start fighting for limited resources. The system gets overburdened. It cannot cope up with the demand. And then it starts crumbling.
The frustration comes out. The media hypes it. The kind of discourse on television these days, makes it sound politically correct to find faults and deficits in an already crumbling system. With political rhetoric and tacit support, people are emboldened to use violence against the doctors. The softest and the easiest target.
These doctors are the same people who are constantly trying to help you in your battle against disease and death. They are on your side. Trying to steer you and take you as farther as possible. Alas, they are also humans! 


#Stop violence against doctors

Sunday, 9 June 2019

CRITICALLY SLAMMED MOVIES I ENJOYED WATCHING

CRITICALLY SLAMMED MOVIES I ENJOYED WATCHING



It has become a fashion and profession to slam everything these days. Be it politics, media, arts or movies. 
To nitpick on the artistic creations of others and brandish it as trash may make one sound knowledgeable and great, but it's unfair to the artists. Take the example of these four movies which I watched recently.
All of them received very mixed reviews. The only one to get some positive reviews was 'De De Pyar De.' Rest of them were literally thrashed and made to sound very mediocre.
But surprisingly, when I watched them I found them to be quite entertaining. It may be so because of the entertainment value.The critics could have been right in finding the technical glitches and flaws. But as long as they entertain, who cares. Audience wants Paisa Vasool entertainment. And these four movies did just that.

Notebook 

Set in the beautiful Kashmir valley, this is a love story. Shot in the beautiful locale of Dal lake, it is mesmerizing and entertaining. A message of love and way to get the misguided youth back on track was very appealing. Thoroughly enjoyable flick.
I have reviewed it separately. Check it out.

Tashkent Files

A movie exploring the alleged murder of Lal Bahadur Shastri is totally engrossing and keeps you hooked till the very end. 
The media slammed it so badly, giving it a rating of even one star. The movie had brought out the hideous role of the media in the conspiracy to murder Shastri. Maybe they were uncomfortable with it.
The role of Intelligence agencies, government, international politics, local politics, media and pseudo intellectuals is brilliantly played out. It is so valid in today's time.
In fact this is a movie which one should not miss, at any cost.

De De Pear De

DDPD is a one hell of hilarious ride. Ajay Devghan and Tabu at their best. Tackling social issues with  balance, grace and poise; it keeps it light hearted and enjoyable.
As I said this one had garnered reasonably good praise from the critics. And it surpassed their analysis. Thoroughly enjoyable.

Bharat

It was badly thrashed by the critics. Giving it a very average rating. But I watched it and was in for a big surprise!
Although totally a BHAI film, it makes you laugh, cry and emote in equal measures. The horrors of partition and the long lasting effects through the story of Bharat (metaphorically too) is endearing and enjoyable.
The loose similarity with Forrest Gump is actually not noticeable at all. If you have seen the original, there is hardly any similarity in the character. So it is just not a valid comparison.
This is gonna be Bhai's major block buster for sure!

So, the next time you read a review and decide to watch a movie, think twice. Many a times they are misguiding and biased. If you connect with the subject, just go for it. Damn the critics.